CO129-073 - Lieut. Governor Caine & Sir Bowring - 1859 [1-5] — Page 454

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

451

I will not however repeat all he said on the occasion; but the case.

(

344

Instant during the investigation at the Police Court in Libel brought against Mr. Tarrant, Mr. May was called as a witness: during Cross Examination by the defendant he was asked, if to his knowledge I knew anything of the Chinese written language, and also whether I had ever translated Chinese documents. Mr. May gave a negative reply to both these questions.

In consequence of Mr. May's replies, Mr. Tarrant spoke in very strong language against me, calling me an Impostor. I bring this matter to the notice of His Excellency because I conceive it to be one which I should be blameable in not representing. I have an abundance of proof to show that Mr. May is perfectly aware that I have a knowledge of the Chinese written language.

So palpably untrue were Mr. May's replies, that I have not the slightest hesitation in charging him with wilful and deliberate intention to injure me by giving evidence which he must have known to be false.

Edit History

2026-05-18 11:00:32 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
451I will not however repeat all he said on the occasion; but the case.(344Instant during the investigation at the Police Court in Libel brought against Mr. Tarrant, Mr. May was called as a witness: during Cross Examination by the defendant he was asked, if to his knowledge I knew anything of the Chinese written language, and also whether I had ever translated Chinese documents. Mr. May gave a negative reply to both these questions.In consequence of Mr. May's replies, Mr. Tarrant spoke in very strong language against me, calling me an Impostor. I bring this matter to the notice of His Excellency because I conceive it to be one which I should be blameable in not representing. I have an abundance of proof to show that Mr. May is perfectly aware that I have a knowledge of the Chinese written language.So palpably untrue were Mr. May's replies, that I have not the slightest hesitation in charging him with wilful and deliberate intention to injure me by giving evidence which he must have known to be false.
Baseline (Original)
451Iwill not however pepeat all he said on the occasion; but thethe case.(344Instant during the.. investigation at the Polier. Court in ofLibet. brought against MH" "Tarrant, Mr. May was calls. as Кwitness : during Cross Examination byhis the deficidauk he was asked, if to his noknowled go I knew anything 7 the Chiness written language. and also whether I had ever-trauslandSoreplies of Mr. May bring palpably untrue, I have not the slightest hesitation in Charging him with wilful and deliberate intention to infiereme lbygiving evidence which he must have known to be fales,Ibingand Chinese documentsnotice0ofany for him to both theseinGurstions Mr.May'sMr May gave a negativepplyConsequence of replies Mr Tarrant spoke in: very strong language against me, Calling me auImpostor . this matter to the His Excellency because Iconceive it to be one which Ishould be blameable in not pepresenting .abundance I could produceAwart of proof to show that Mr. May is perfectly that I have a knowledge of the
2026-05-18 11:00:32 · Baseline
View content

451

Iwill not however pepeat all he

said on the occasion; but the

the case.

(

344

Instant during

the.. investigation

at the Polier. Court in

of

Libet. brought against

MH

" "Tarrant, Mr. May was calls.

as

К

witness : during

Cross Examination by

his

the

deficidauk

he was asked,

if

to his no

knowled go I knew anything

7

the Chiness written language.

and also whether I had ever-

trausland

So

replies of Mr. May bring palpably untrue, I have not the slightest hesitation in Charging him with wilful and deliberate intention to infiere

me l

by

giving evidence which he must have known to be fales,

Ibing

and

Chinese documents

notice

0

of

any for him to both these

in

Gurstions

Mr. May's

Mr May gave a negativepply

Consequence of replies Mr Tarrant spoke in : very strong language against

me,

Calling

me au

Impostor .

this matter to the

His Excellency

because

Iconceive it to be one which

Ishould be blameable in not

pepresenting .

abundance

I could produce

Awart

of proof to show that Mr. May is perfectly that I have a knowledge of the

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.